So, over the past couple of years I have told you how to minimise the risk of buying a fake Mulberry and where to go to have it authenticated. What I haven't shown you is some of the detail that can give away a fake bag straight away. I obviously don't have an endless supply of fakes but I do have this Mulberry Oversized Alexa, so have a look at my video and pics and take note of the signs that give away a bag as fake! (By the way, it's not this one - different bag!)
And as promised - some pictures to accompany the video!
The fake is the 'watermelon' colour, the black is my genuine one.
The most obvious first: the Imprint on the oval and the fob with the tree.
See
how the genuine Mulberry's font is a sans serif, i.e. without little
lines at the end of each letter? All straight lines. It is also neatly
printed and not smudged (if a bit worn on my battered Lexie).
The stitching is neat and even - though I have seen genuine bags with messier stitching!
The
metal fob, which is hanging off the oval is neatly imprinted. Now, I
can never remember how many leaves are in which position but the genuine
tree has sharply printed leaves.
The
fake bag's Mulberry imprint font is more 'frilly' looking, the letters
emulate more of a serif font, i.e. little lines at the ends of the
letters. It is also badly printed and not very straight.
The stitching is fairly even but has a weird kink on the left hand side.
The leaves of the tree on the metal fob are rounder and not as sharp.
Back of the fob and serial number
The font on the back of the fob is likewise a sans serif, straight numbers, neatly lasered (or etched?) on.
The
font of the numbers on the fake bag is much more frilly. Whilst some
vintage bags have numbers that are actually imprinted into fonts rather
than etched or lasered, I have only ever seen straight, non serif fonts.
Now, the made in label isn't as obvious.
Above the genuine...
...the fake below.
I don't have a 'Made in England' label from an Alexa on file but this is from another genuine bag and if you compare the 'g' in England, you can see how the genuine one looks more old fashioned - funnily enough a bit more frilly than the fake font. They just can't get it right, can they. ;)
The genuine magnetic closure...
is raised and has a distinct ridge.
The fake bag's magnetic closure is fairly flat and has no ridge.
Closure straps
The genuine bag has straight screws on the back of the metal tabs at the end
of the straps. The tree imprint is even and neat and the metal totally
flat around it.
The
screws on the fake bag have Phillips heads (i.e. like a cross). The
tree imprint looks fairly neat but the metal is depressed around the
tree as well.
And Something else I noticed:
See how there is only stitching to what you see above and below the tree rivet (this is to the left and right of the top handle).
The fake bag has stitching top and bottom and left and right. This isn't present on the genuine bag at all.
There are actually another few differences but these are the most obvious ones. Hopefully you will find them useful, but do bear in mind that every model can have its own markers. The new generation of Mulberry (under Coca's design) has changed significantly and many of said characteristics have disappeared altogether. Nothing beats spending £5 and getting it authenticated by professionals! And even somebody who has handled lots of bags (ahm, me), isn't safe: I would have sworn this was the real deal!
